Select Page
150 going on 200

150 going on 200

150 going on 200

I’ve walked you through my experience of getting ready for my first Regent committee meeting. Today I want to share what I discovered that day and continue to learn about how we’re trying to address pressing issues but also how we’re trying to think big picture ten, twenty, fifty years down the line. Because it’s critical to think ahead. Because we want to be ready for the future when it arrives. Because it goes by fast. Because as an institution and as a community, we really are 150 going on 200.

Let’s start with something physical, tangible. There’s a lot of discussion around maintenance – particularly deferred maintenance – which is an ongoing need when you’re dealing with buildings that are 150 years old and need everything from updated electronics, sprinkler systems, and a whole host of general upkeep.

A lot of colleges struggle with this issue.

And when our state doesn’t put any money toward the badly needed deferred maintenance (with the exception of Memorial Stadium, the only building that receives continual maintenance) then we’re looking at some tough decisions about whether to refurbish a building or to tear it down. I’m kind of a softie for historical buildings but I discovered that there is actually a formula that has been developed to help make that determination. Still, it’s not always an easy choice: to build or to maintain?

Speaking of physical, let’s talk about sports. We know that concussions in football are a serious problem, so much so that in Florida the youngest leagues that started in kindergarten have been suspended for fear of long-term damage to children’s brains. We also know it’s a beloved team sport that can have a big impact on people’s lives. So where’s the middle ground between protecting students’ health and celebrating a beloved sport?

There’s a new helmet design out there with the capacity to record and measure all kinds of impact data and relay that information wirelessly to a computer on the sidelines monitored by the coaching team.

That way teams can monitor (and in theory, respond proactively to) potentially damaging or dangerous situations that could put the student athlete at risk. Could be very useful. 

But hey, let’s go a little further down the sports-talk rabbit hole. We have an almost religious devotion to football but there are a number of other engaging, dynamic sports to consider.

Our women’s volleyball team for example is a national champion and their games are constantly sold out.

Maybe it would be worth moving their games to a bigger arena, sharing the spotlight, encouraging more variety in our athletic devotion. When there’s so much to celebrate, why not widen our focus?

At the end of the day, deferred maintenance and school sports are just two of many, many aspects of our university that will benefit from some forward thinking. Whether it’s academic, social, financial, or structural, a successful future will require an openness to explore new ideas today.

And all of these discussions got me thinking about this: what is a Regent’s role in preparing for the future?

In some ways, I see us as guardians. As guides. We’re here to do all we can to ensure that the entire University of Nebraska community has reason to celebrate its 200th birthday as much as its 150th.

 

 

 

*Barbara’s thoughts as written by Kate based on weekly (fascinating) conversations.

All Hands On Deck

All Hands On Deck

ALL HANDS ON DECK!

Technology has come a long way when it comes to navigation. From early astrolabes to modern autopilots, tech of all kinds has long been a critical tool. But at the end of the day, that’s what it is: a tool. What makes a journey is direction. A destination. A ship without a captain and destination is just a bunch of floating wood. A university without a President… well, it risks becoming adrift.

The University of Nebraska has a lot of moving parts. One in seven people in Nebraska work for the university in some capacity. There are hundreds of programs over several campuses. It takes a massive, well-coordinated crew not only to keep things running smoothly, but also to plot a course for the future that benefits the students, the staff, and the community as a whole. Key to that coordination is having an intelligent, conscientious, visionary leader who can help figure out how best to make that journey.

So you can see why not having a President is a problem.

Our current University of Nebraska President, Hank Bounds, is leaving in August. That gives us as Regents about three months to find someone who is going to continue the work of guiding the University in a positive direction. What I’ve discovered so far is that opinions on how to conduct that search are as plentiful and varied as fish in the sea. Do we search with a professional company? Do we search by committee? Will there be an interim President? If so, for how long? I sit with these questions and more daily, as do my colleagues. It feels like trying to build a massive piece of Ikea furniture with no pictures, no directions, not even in Swedish.

But hey, there are a lot of deeply dedicated people working together to figure this out. We should be in good shape, right? Don’t go breaking that bottle of champagne just yet. A key part of recruitment is having something amazing to offer. Okay, so, we know that University of Nebraska is an educational leader in a lot of ways (and probably one of the friendliest campuses you’ll find), but when the state is constantly slashing the budget and sacrificing valuable programs, that doesn’t really set us – or our President – up for success. You wouldn’t offer a top captain a ship riddled with holes or missing a rudder and expect them to be excited about it.

It’s no surprise that we are going to work our hardest to find the kind of qualified, skilled and dynamic leader that the University of Nebraska deserves. But let’s make sure that from the ground up and from the state down, we’re working to build a ship that any worthwhile candidate would be proud to sail.

 

*Barbara’s thoughts as written by Kate based on weekly (fascinating) conversations.

What’s Wrong With This Picture?

What’s Wrong With This Picture?

What's wrong with this picture?

Picture, if you will, a prison. Tall, solid, concrete, surrounded by ample fencing and gleaming barbed wire. Cells freshly painted a neutral beige, high-end electronic security systems installed throughout. Throngs of inmates are watched closely by prison guards in crisp uniforms. It’s new, it’s expensive, and it shows.

Now, picture a campus. Cheerful brick buildings surrounded by greenery where students make their way to a variety of classes. The teachers are the brightest and the best, and the attendance in well-equipped classrooms reflects that. In the cafeteria, students chat about weekend plans, career ambitions, and competing job offers, rather than dread of tuition hikes and crushing loans. It’s not impossible, it’s within our grasp, and that matters.

college campus, affordable tuition, university jobs

You may think these two visions have nothing to do with one another.

Unfortunately, they very much do. Because where states choose to invest is a clear statement of priorities. It’s a sad fact that as state tax revenues go down the legislature has cut the University of Nebraska’s operating budgets to lower and lower amounts, while simultaneously pouring money into industries such as – you guessed it – the prison system. Now I’m all for safety and justice and a solution to overcrowding but let’s think about this for a moment.

By continually slashing the budget for education, universities turn to raising tuition rates, putting even more undue pressure on students to shoulder the financial burden, which in turn leads to students dropping out altogether. It also means fewer incentives for great teachers and staff to stay in a system plagued by uncertainty that undervalues them at every turn. As budget cuts continue we risk losing our best faculty and students, our future thinkers and leaders to other states that invest wisely in their university systems.

Let’s look at how this plays out in another practical sense.

Nebraska has a problem with workforce shortage, which leaves companies shipping jobs out elsewhere. One solution? Shore up universities to ensure that we’re recruiting, educating, and releasing into the workforce a large cadre of excellently trained people who will grow and strengthen our industries and economy across the state. It’s pretty straightforward. But what’s the solution that the Governor and some lawmakers are currently pushing for? Give tax incentive packages to large companies to entice them to build here. Here’s why that doesn’t work: let’s say these companies come – they make plenty of profit, pay next to nothing in taxes to support the local infrastructure, and then after a couple years of skilled labor shortage, they jump ship and go elsewhere. How on earth is this a solution that benefits Nebraskans?

There are ways we can find additional resources to make up the funding gap, but we have to think creatively, we have to be bold. Public and private partnerships, entrepreneurship opportunities, even creating our own form of student loans that prioritize student need rather than bleeding them dry before they’ve even had a chance to succeed. Ultimately though we have to ask ourselves – what really matters to us, as Regents, as students and teachers, as Nebraskans?

Picture, if you will, a future for your children and grandchildren that fills you with hope and pride. Now tell me, is there any barbed wire in sight?

*Barbara’s thoughts as written by Kate based on weekly (fascinating) conversations.